How to enable Windows 10 October Update features without updating PC - The new Microsoft Update for your Windows 10 computers is just around the corner and as usual, all members who have Windows Insider can already try the vast majority of the news that will come in time.
The Windows October Update has a lot of new features such as a New Start menu that bets on Fluent Design, a redesigned taskbar that will offer a more personalized experience, as well as the correction of many bugs and improvements that accompany these updates regularly.
If you want, until now, either you signed up for the Windows Insider Program or you expected it to arrive on your computer, but now it is possible to activate the features of Windows 10 October Update without installing the update.
Enable Windows 10 October Update features without updating PC
However, keep in mind that editing your computer's registry can be dangerous, so make a backup before you start.
If you want to use the features of Windows 10 20H2 without having to update your computer, follow these simple steps:
-Go to Settings > System > About and verify that you are running Build 19041.450 or later.
-Now, open notepad and copy and paste the following: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FeatureManagement\Overrides\0\2093230218] "EnabledState"=dword:00000002 "EnabledStateOptions"=dword:00000000
-Save content wherever you want with the extension .reg and double-click to open it and modify the Windows Registry.
-Finally, restart the computer.
Once you've done this, you'll know how to use the new features of the October update of Windows 10 without having to update your computer or be a subscriber to the Windows Insider Program and enjoy its new features.
Thanks for reading Enable Windows 10 October Update features without updating PC
The judicial review to Glovo in Spain by false self-employed tightens the siege on the work model of riders throughout Europe
A few days after the adoption of the bill regulating the employment situation of the delivery companies of Glovo and Deliveroo, the Spanish justice has given the former.
This Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the workers and claims that the riders of the well-known application were Wage Earners and, therefore, they were working as false self-employed, in a historic judgment after the long judicial litigation of the company in Spain. Glovo, for its part, assured to respect the decision of the High Court pending, they say, a new regulatory framework that normalises the rules of the game for companies like her and Deliveroo.
Both have their hopes set in Europe, where " several judgments validate [their] model, such as the latest one from the court of Justice of the European Union (TSUE)". This is inaccurate, as the self of the judiciary committee —that talks about the self-employed in general, not of the riders in particular— recognizes that there is no relationship of employability, yes, but leaves it in the hands of the jurisdiction of each member apply the same concept of worker; that is, that the criteria depend on the legislation of each country, which are very different from each other.
Does this mean that the Supreme Court's ruling is final on Glovo's situation in Spain? Nothing further from reality. The car marks jurisprudence on the current work model of the riders and sets an important precedent, but also opens the hand to a new regulation led by the government and unified within the European framework. This regulation is what they cling to.
But in the other countries of the Old Continent the situation is no less controversial.
The Germans have always had strong regulatory frameworks to thwart precariousness, discrimination and atomization in the platform economy, but lack specific regulations to designate gig workers (sporadic and/or submerged workers), most of them false self-employed. Their only defence is therefore the courts, but the gaps in their jurisdiction remain as present as in Spain.
"It is difficult to know with certainty how a court or tribunal will end up classifying the employment relationship when adjudicating disputes," notes a recent Fair Work Study on the issue. Mainly, the biggest problem facing their courts is the very definition of "platform" — understood as the workplace-and the implications of this interpretation for judges.
This situation creates a number of legal loopholes that digital platforms exploit for their benefit. In this way, companies such as Deliveroo or Vereinte manage to "legalize" their workers as false self-employed (Scheinselbstständigkeit), saving Social Security costs and other labour rights, including minimum wage and collective bargaining. In recent times, sentences have been passed in favour of the workers, but the war is far from over.
"As there are no special regulations [...] it is difficult to distinguish employees from self-employed, " notes a PwC report. In addition to this problem, the decisions of the labour courts on the employment situation of workers are not binding on, for example, the social courts, forming a perfect breeding ground for the legal tangle.
His legal record shows this, since there are still conflicting judgments depending on what the judge understands, not the legislation, although the government is already at work. This is precisely one of the pending subjects of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, which has been working since 2018 on a new regulatory framework that accommodates collective bargaining rights and other basic labour rights in employment contracts on these platforms.
Despite the success of the platforms in cities such as La Rochelle, Bayonne, Libourne and Pau, the Uberisation of working conditions in France continues as in its seed, also with regard to precariousness.
So far, the government has entrusted the creation of a special statute to Jean-Yves Frouin, former president of the social Chamber of the Court of Cassation, which will "define the different possible scenarios and build a framework that allows representation of workers on digital platforms" in a uniform way, reports Sud Oest. Its findings will be released in October.
” The objective of this mission is to strengthen the model of platforms that want to maintain a link of subordination with their workers, without paying social contributions, " says Arthur Hay, general secretary of CGT-Riders in Gironda. "For them, the greatest danger would be to be forced into a massive re-qualification."
For the time being, and to step up, the French model focuses on an independent work scheme with reinforced rights: accident cover, transparency, training, compensation or space for dialogue. It is provisional, until Frouin ends his status, but it considers the workers as self-employed, so it is one of the legal frameworks most applauded by companies like Glovo.
In parallel to the general rules, the Court of Cassation confirmed in March a ruling similar to that seen this week by the Spanish Supreme, forcing Uber to reclassify the working conditions of a false self-employed, now employed by the VTC. The same is happening with some riders from, for example, Deliveroo, who last February received 30,000 euros in compensation for the reclassification of their contract —from self—employed to hired -.
At the legal level, the only possible classification in the eyes of judges as to whether or not a worker is false self-employed would, according to PwC, focus on whether there is a hierarchical link between the platform and the individual. If there is no complete independence, the worker must be considered an employee, but once again the different interpretations of what this "Independence" implies require full regulation at the state level.
Italy has a legislative tradition quite similar to the Spanish one, but its government has made more progress than ours in forming a new regulatory framework for platform work.
Its progress in the new Labor Relations schemes for delivery and VTC workers, approved in November 2019, chooses to recognize the work model of the platforms as autonomous, but with a few added Rights and obligations for the worker. One of these is the already mentioned collective bargaining of riders and the qualification of work for others in case there is no agreement.
For the time being, one of the solutions envisaged by Italian legislation is to divide platform workers into three categories: employees (subordinate, normal), self-employed and so-called "collaborators / parasubordinates / semi-subordinates "(in Italy, "co.co.co."), which for practically all purposes are interpreted as autonomous. To differentiate one from the other, the criterion is only hierarchical (what relationship do you have with your bosses) and salary effect (by hours or by work done?), never according to economic dependence.
It is one formula, another one, of the many that are being tested all over the world.
Thus, several companies and social agents are already working to promote a collective agreement that establishes more rights and coverage for the distributors, while maintaining an independent and autonomous work scheme. This is the main claim of firms like Glovo, which claim the same in Spain.