With simple trick know stolen wifi connection - You are browsing the Internet and notice that your connection is slower than usual. Has it ever happened to you? It is clear that in many cases it can be due to a problem of the phone company with which you have contracted the signal, lack of signal that you can solve with a repeater and the worst: that someone may be taking advantage of your connection.

Luckily it is very simple to know if you are stealing your wifi and does not require complicated formulas or codes that you have to put in your computer, as you are enough and you have plenty of an application for your smartphone.

If you finally discover that someone has access, even if you can delete them from the ecosystem, you already know your credentials, so you'll have to enter the router settings to change the password and end the problem.

If you want to check if someone has access to your Wi-Fi connection, will it be worth downloading Fing for iOS devices or who is on my wifi? for Android devices.

Its operation is really simple and you will only have to give him the necessary permissions so that he can do his job.

Simple trick know stolen wifi connection

The best thing about these applications is that the specific names of the devices that are connected to that network will appear, so if you do not recognize any is that someone has been able to enter your home network and you will have to put measures.

The process as basic as entering the app, Finding It devices, entering the one you want to delete and simply deleting it so that the app can perform the process.

Once you've done this, you'll know if someone is stealing your wifi. The only and most important thing, as you have already been able to read above keep in mind that even if you have deleted the user who was taking advantage of your network, you already know your credentials, so you will have to change the password to avoid major evils.

End of Simple trick know stolen wifi connection


More

The obstacles companies have to prove when it is the worker himself who attacks, according to a prosecutor specializing in telematic crimes

The pandemic has forced many companies to rapidly adopt telework, putting them at risk of computer incidents. Threats on the net soared 2,000% according to a report involving ElevenPaths, the cybersecurity firm of Telefónica Tech, and the stress caused by confinement caused many workers to be more likely to fall into the tricks of cybercriminals, according to a Stanford study.

Several CISO-responsible for computer security in the Company-companies such as Talgo, Homeserve or Sacyr acknowledged at an event last Thursday that as soon as the state of alarm was decreed, business continuity was prioritized over the security of its infrastructure.

It has been 6 months since the health emergency was decreed and the data of coronavirus infections have gone worse since the alarm was raised. Some communities have decreed new confinement, and the situation in Madrid is particularly delicate.

All this time, experts and entrepreneurs in the cybersecurity sector have warned that it is necessary that many companies correct the mistakes that were made in March to avoid repeating them now. The government finalizes a meeting with the social partners before adopting the New telework law, which could provide protection in this regard.

It is precisely the legal protection and collaboration between the public and private sector one of the keys discussed recently Ana Martín de la Escalera, prosecutor attached to the specialized unit against cybercrime of the Attorney General's office; and Rodrigo Hornos, responsible for the discipline of Data Protection at BBVA bank. They did so in the framework of the cybersecurity innovation program (PIC) jointly taught by Deusto Business School and ICADE Business School.

In the field of cybersecurity, it is common for perimeter tasks to be carried out around the networks that connect workers ' devices and servers with the company's digital assets. Therefore, in addition to properly securing these perimeters, it is essential that the company's employees are a key containment wall against cyber attacks.

For this reason it is essential that employees of any company have adequate training in cybersecurity: if it is not for the privacy of oneself, that prudence is, at least, to avoid a disgust with an attack on the company.

The famous hacker and Digital Customer Manager of Telefónica, Chema Alonso, abounded a few weeks ago in what are the new trends with which cybercriminals are able to assault private firms: cybercriminals no longer need to get a password.

"They even do surveillance work in the physical world," says attorney Ana Martín de la Escalera. "They watch what workers he has, what customers he has." Alonso himself even described what OSINT consists of, research techniques with open sources. In other words: cybercriminals are able to track you or other employees on the internet in order to trick you into accessing an attack on the company.

"In the private sector we focus more on the preparation of a computer incident than on other points of view, coo that of repair." Another approach to the problem is that of recovery after a cyber incident: finding those responsible. This aspect, of course, is entrusted to the Judiciary. For this reason, Hornos, of BBVA, detailed in his appearance that the private sector and the public sector "we have to be very aligned".

A post posted on the blog of the computer Incident Response Team of the National Institute of cybersecurity, the INCIBE CERT, emphasized the importance of insiders, workers or ex-workers of a company that facilitate cyber criminals attacks on their company-when they are not themselves directly the participants. So much so that even Microsoft has taken action, and several companies have hired IBM hackers to help raise cybersecurity awareness.

"Not all cases are from the famous insiders, many incidents in the private sector come from the hand of recklessness." In fact, Hornos points out that " even children have been scammed with fraud through video games like Fortnite."

Ana Martín de la Escalera has acknowledged that "one of the big problems" facing the prosecutor's office is to assess "to what extent an entrepreneur can access the devices he makes available to his employees without incurring an offense".

"The doctrine that has been marking the supreme in relation to this matter is not homogeneous, but it is quite settled and is based on a famous judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, the famous Barbulesco case", sums up. In the end, content that an employee stores on an enterprise device is understood to enjoy "a modulated privacy right."

"The device you have in your hands is for use in the workplace, and therefore the employer will be able to control the use you make of it and report on the mechanisms. An expectation of privacy on the part of the employee cannot be expected."

But in the criminal field, the jurisprudence of the Supreme "is clear" :" at a certain time, when the activity of the employer in accessing a device used by an employee involves discovering and obtaining evidence, the Supreme says that measures or criteria must be adopted to give validity to them".

In this sense, "this right of the employer of control and surveillance will not suffice: parameters such as whether it may have been previously notified or if access is justified because there are well-founded suspicions that the employee is carrying out an illegal act". The measure, ultimately, to intercept one of these famous insiders has to be "proportionate and necessary". Otherwise, evidence against an employee who is cyberattacking a company, no matter how conclusive, may have no place.

You may also find interesting: